We, the US, are not a banana republic. However, if one did not have a sense of history and just arrived on Earth, and followed the Trump administration the last week or so--that person might have a different assessment.
Today I read that the tenure of "the Mooch" has ended. The erstwhile Director of Communications lasted a week and a half. Eleven days. The new chief of staff, John Kelly--in this role for a few days,--urged the president to make the change.
So, in a couple of weeks, the press secretary, chief of staff, director of communication have all resigned. Russia is threatening to remove over 100 members of the US diplomatic core in Russia. North Korea has threatened the United States. The President made a speech to the boyscouts that would have gotten him tossed out of Student Government in any high school in the country. The extraterrestrial might figure we are a banana republic.
I just completed a book of short stories by O.Henry. It is called, appropriately, Stories of O.Henry. I was surprised to read in the preface that O.Henry was a different sort of person than I had imagined. We all are familiar with his most famous story, "The Gift of the Magi" which is in the collection. Also, while it is not in the collection I remember reading "The Ransom of Red Chief" in high school which is pretty funny. It is about some no-goodniks who kidnap a kid to get money from his rich folks, only to find out that the kid is impossible to control. The parents, aware of this, force the kidnappers to pay them to take the kid back.
If not a no-goodnick, O.Henry was a bit of an eccentric character. The guy drank himself to death allegedly knocking back two bottles of whiskey a day for the last decade of his life. He had worked in a bank, was subsequently arrested for embezzling, and spent three years in jail. When first arrested he went south of the border to avoid capture, only to return when his wife proved too sick to join him.
His stories, I figured, would be easy to digest. I'd read "The Gift of the Magi" which is not too difficult and "...Red Chief" and then another very short one called, "It Makes the Whole World Kin." These three are relatively simple, but they are aberrations. Most of the stories in this volume are work--sometimes work that is worth the effort, but nevertheless, not walks in the park.
It was worth the entire collection of 23 stories to read a long paragraph on page 113 about adventurers and those who do not have courage to take chances. Also, a story about pancakes was excellent.
In the pancake one, a cowboy is interested in a friend's niece. He attempts to court her and is initially successful. One day he comes to visit and a rancher is out riding with the woman. Well, the cowboy is upset and approaches the rival ready to duke it out. The rival tells him he has no interest, that he is a homebody, and is only riding with her because she has a terrific recipe for pancakes. If, says the rival, the cowboy can get the recipe from the niece, he promises to never see the woman again. This strikes the cowboy as a good deal, but every time he brings up the pancake recipe to the woman, she looks at him strangely which he interprets to mean that nobody gets this family recipe. Each time he mentions pancakes, she stares at him frostily, disappears, and then the uncle comes out with a glass of water to placate the suitor.
One day the cowboy comes to visit the woman and the uncle says that she ran off and married the rival. The cowboy is furious. He finds out that the woman never made a pancake in her life, but the rancher rival had told both the woman and the uncle, that the cowboy was a bit crazy and you could tell he was about to go postal whenever he started talking about pancakes.
Anyway I can't recommend the collection in its entirety as it really was hard work. Besides a number of the stories I could take or leave. The stories aside, however, I found the history of O.Henry interesting particularly when I read today--on the heels of the Mooch firing-- that it was O.Henry who coined the term "banana republic" from his outlaw days living south of the border and observing the ways of countries where he was hiding.
On a peripheral note, I read a best seller called, The Woman in Cabin 10. Very high on the ridickalus scale. I'd pass and move on to cabin 11.
Monday, July 31, 2017
Friday, July 28, 2017
McCain
When I was in high school, and probably when everyone was in high school, there was a big fat reader that was used in English class. In it were dozens of short stories.
I have forgotten most of them, but a few stick in my head. One had a title close to the saying, "As ye sow, so shall ye reap." I tried to find it last night, but could not so maybe the title I've recalled is a little bit off, but I remember the essence of the story.
The essence was, what you do in life plants the seeds for what will happen later in life. Your actions will affect future developments even if those developments are unrelated to the prior action.
And that is, at least in part, what fueled what happened last night. The bad news last night was that I woke up at 1 am and had some trouble getting back to sleep. The good news was that I went to the computer at that hour and saw that the senate was voting on what has been called the skinny health care bill--a repeal of ObamaCare and a replacement with a thin health care bill that had been cobbled together. I flipped on CNN and watched the drama live and its aftermath.
The vote was going to be close because all 48 Democrats were going to vote against it. Support required 50 of the 52 Republican senators to vote for it.
I attempt, without much success, to separate the fact that I do not like the person Donald Trump from my assessment of how he performs as president. It is not an easy separation because the character of a president is a component of what makes a president a good or bad one. Also character influences behavioral decisions. Still, I try to say to myself, "just because I don't like him, doesn't mean he might not be effective."
Well so far, Trump has solidified my sense that he is not a good person. His speech to the boy scouts was outrageous--just for an example. Not accepting responsibility for failures of his administration is another. The president reminds me of the fraternity guy who brags about how much money he has, but whenever you try to get a few bucks from him to pitch in for a keg, pats his pockets and says he must have left his wallet in his BMW. Or the guy who walks out of the can where he has left a predictable odor, but yanks his thumb over his shoulder like an indifferent hitchhiker saying "Wasn't me." He's boastful and not the slightest bit willing to take responsibility. Just don't like the guy.
What irks me most is how he speaks of other people. During the campaign he referred to his Republican competitors--two sitting senators--as "those two morons". President Obama was appropriately professional during the transition, yet since taking office Trump has gratuitously disparaged him.
Perhaps the most outrageous thing he has ever said, was when he was discussing Republican Senator John McCain. When someone pointed out that McCain was a war hero, Trump commented that he is only a hero because he got caught. Trump continued saying that he liked people who did not get caught.
So last night Trump needs 50 senators to vote in support of the skinny repeal and replace. Murkowski from Alaska, and Collins from Maine, two Republicans, vote against it. It comes down to McCain's vote. The guy just had brain surgery. The guy has been diagnosed with terminal brain cancer. He comes back to Washington to vote. And votes against Trump's repeal and replace.
Now maybe it was ideology, but maybe it was "Hey you sob, let me tell you what heroism is."
I have forgotten most of them, but a few stick in my head. One had a title close to the saying, "As ye sow, so shall ye reap." I tried to find it last night, but could not so maybe the title I've recalled is a little bit off, but I remember the essence of the story.
The essence was, what you do in life plants the seeds for what will happen later in life. Your actions will affect future developments even if those developments are unrelated to the prior action.
And that is, at least in part, what fueled what happened last night. The bad news last night was that I woke up at 1 am and had some trouble getting back to sleep. The good news was that I went to the computer at that hour and saw that the senate was voting on what has been called the skinny health care bill--a repeal of ObamaCare and a replacement with a thin health care bill that had been cobbled together. I flipped on CNN and watched the drama live and its aftermath.
The vote was going to be close because all 48 Democrats were going to vote against it. Support required 50 of the 52 Republican senators to vote for it.
I attempt, without much success, to separate the fact that I do not like the person Donald Trump from my assessment of how he performs as president. It is not an easy separation because the character of a president is a component of what makes a president a good or bad one. Also character influences behavioral decisions. Still, I try to say to myself, "just because I don't like him, doesn't mean he might not be effective."
Well so far, Trump has solidified my sense that he is not a good person. His speech to the boy scouts was outrageous--just for an example. Not accepting responsibility for failures of his administration is another. The president reminds me of the fraternity guy who brags about how much money he has, but whenever you try to get a few bucks from him to pitch in for a keg, pats his pockets and says he must have left his wallet in his BMW. Or the guy who walks out of the can where he has left a predictable odor, but yanks his thumb over his shoulder like an indifferent hitchhiker saying "Wasn't me." He's boastful and not the slightest bit willing to take responsibility. Just don't like the guy.
What irks me most is how he speaks of other people. During the campaign he referred to his Republican competitors--two sitting senators--as "those two morons". President Obama was appropriately professional during the transition, yet since taking office Trump has gratuitously disparaged him.
Perhaps the most outrageous thing he has ever said, was when he was discussing Republican Senator John McCain. When someone pointed out that McCain was a war hero, Trump commented that he is only a hero because he got caught. Trump continued saying that he liked people who did not get caught.
So last night Trump needs 50 senators to vote in support of the skinny repeal and replace. Murkowski from Alaska, and Collins from Maine, two Republicans, vote against it. It comes down to McCain's vote. The guy just had brain surgery. The guy has been diagnosed with terminal brain cancer. He comes back to Washington to vote. And votes against Trump's repeal and replace.
Now maybe it was ideology, but maybe it was "Hey you sob, let me tell you what heroism is."
Thursday, July 27, 2017
Save Box
Every couple of months either I or my brother, or both of us, go to Florida to check on the condo we inherited. Typically we/I stay only two or three days before heading back. That was the plan this time.
I got here on Sunday, watered the plants, checked on the general condition of the place--then met up with my Camp friends Wally and Eileen for the dinners which we always enjoy whenever I stroll into town. On Monday I met a guy for lunch down by the beach, and on Tuesday I enjoyed lunch with my twin cousins who live in south florida. Plan was to depart on Wednesday morning.
I returned from my afternoon lunch with my cousins and walked into a steam bath. It has been broiling in Florida this week. Very humid, every day in the 90s. When I walked into the unit I expected the refreshing cool air of the air conditioner. But nay. It was hotter than Hades in the condo.
The bad news was that the air conditioner unit had stopped working. The good news is that it had stopped working while I was here. Otherwise it could have been months without air and the place would be mold city.
I had to scramble to get HVAC people to take a look and give estimates (which were widely disparate in terms of what they thought the problem was). Meanwhile I had to cancel flights, extend rental car, and in general rearrange quite a bit.
One fellow came out and shook his head predicting financial disaster. Another guy got it to work by ramming his hand on top of the unit, and them pushing the fan with his screwdriver. Alas that inexpensive remedy did not last through the night. Today a third person took a look and explained in what amounted to a foreign language what was wrong and what he fixed. So far, knock on wood, because of his actions the ac is working. I will be staying here tomorrow, just to make sure it works for a day before I head back to Boston.
I figured that I had some extra time (a) waiting for the repairmen to come during their 1:30 to 4 slot (arrived at 3:50) (b) waiting to see if the work worked.
Previously my brother and I had gone through the entire house and thrown out various items that needed to go. We did keep some items in boxes marked "Save Box" for either one of us. It is well over a year since I put stuff in my Save Box. With the extra time waiting to see if the air will remain cold, I thought I'd go through it.
This could be a testament to my failing memory, but much of the stuff in that box i had not seen before. I think in our haste to go through items in the past, there were some things that looked like they might be worth saving, that I put in my box, without really studying the item. I hope that is the case, otherwise my memory is shot.
Regardless, the items in there were remarkable. There were telegrams my father sent to my mother when he was stationed in Japan during WWII. I saw an invitation to, not my parents' wedding, but to the reception that followed. There were the formal thank you notes to those who sent gifts at the wedding. A bunch of letters that I had sent to my folks--many far wittier than what I compose nowadays. A poem that I'd composed to the pace of The Raven that I remember writing and mailing, but did not remember having seen in the last 30 years. A great card with a picture of a sheep on a desert island. You open it up and it reads "Isle of Ewe." Dad must have loved sending that and mom probably is still rolling her eyes in the grave.
Also in the box was junk that I cannot believe I saved the first go round. Those items did not make the second cut.
Well, I kept the items I thought were special, but I wondered who else would think they were. Would my nephew get a charge out of going though the Save Box. Would his kids at some point think it was neat. I do know that I enjoyed the romp through the Save Box. Our past is just the backdrop to our present. It helps put what is current in perspective.
I took a break during the sifting through the Save Box and thought it would be appropriate to go to a Chinese restaurant my dad liked in the area. He went there so much that he had his own card with a discount. On his last Thanksgiving, after my mother died, I was down here to visit. We were going to go to get a turkey dinner, but instead ate Thanksgiving dinner at the Chinese restaurant. It was hardly the only time I had gone there with him. But tonight, three years later, when I was eating my egg rolls and hot and sour soup, I recalled that Thanksgiving and sitting across from him. I smiled, looked up at the empty side of the table, and said, "thanks for the stuff in the box." It sort of felt like he smiled back. I should have said, "Isle of Ewe"
I got here on Sunday, watered the plants, checked on the general condition of the place--then met up with my Camp friends Wally and Eileen for the dinners which we always enjoy whenever I stroll into town. On Monday I met a guy for lunch down by the beach, and on Tuesday I enjoyed lunch with my twin cousins who live in south florida. Plan was to depart on Wednesday morning.
I returned from my afternoon lunch with my cousins and walked into a steam bath. It has been broiling in Florida this week. Very humid, every day in the 90s. When I walked into the unit I expected the refreshing cool air of the air conditioner. But nay. It was hotter than Hades in the condo.
The bad news was that the air conditioner unit had stopped working. The good news is that it had stopped working while I was here. Otherwise it could have been months without air and the place would be mold city.
I had to scramble to get HVAC people to take a look and give estimates (which were widely disparate in terms of what they thought the problem was). Meanwhile I had to cancel flights, extend rental car, and in general rearrange quite a bit.
One fellow came out and shook his head predicting financial disaster. Another guy got it to work by ramming his hand on top of the unit, and them pushing the fan with his screwdriver. Alas that inexpensive remedy did not last through the night. Today a third person took a look and explained in what amounted to a foreign language what was wrong and what he fixed. So far, knock on wood, because of his actions the ac is working. I will be staying here tomorrow, just to make sure it works for a day before I head back to Boston.
I figured that I had some extra time (a) waiting for the repairmen to come during their 1:30 to 4 slot (arrived at 3:50) (b) waiting to see if the work worked.
Previously my brother and I had gone through the entire house and thrown out various items that needed to go. We did keep some items in boxes marked "Save Box" for either one of us. It is well over a year since I put stuff in my Save Box. With the extra time waiting to see if the air will remain cold, I thought I'd go through it.
This could be a testament to my failing memory, but much of the stuff in that box i had not seen before. I think in our haste to go through items in the past, there were some things that looked like they might be worth saving, that I put in my box, without really studying the item. I hope that is the case, otherwise my memory is shot.
Regardless, the items in there were remarkable. There were telegrams my father sent to my mother when he was stationed in Japan during WWII. I saw an invitation to, not my parents' wedding, but to the reception that followed. There were the formal thank you notes to those who sent gifts at the wedding. A bunch of letters that I had sent to my folks--many far wittier than what I compose nowadays. A poem that I'd composed to the pace of The Raven that I remember writing and mailing, but did not remember having seen in the last 30 years. A great card with a picture of a sheep on a desert island. You open it up and it reads "Isle of Ewe." Dad must have loved sending that and mom probably is still rolling her eyes in the grave.
Also in the box was junk that I cannot believe I saved the first go round. Those items did not make the second cut.
Well, I kept the items I thought were special, but I wondered who else would think they were. Would my nephew get a charge out of going though the Save Box. Would his kids at some point think it was neat. I do know that I enjoyed the romp through the Save Box. Our past is just the backdrop to our present. It helps put what is current in perspective.
I took a break during the sifting through the Save Box and thought it would be appropriate to go to a Chinese restaurant my dad liked in the area. He went there so much that he had his own card with a discount. On his last Thanksgiving, after my mother died, I was down here to visit. We were going to go to get a turkey dinner, but instead ate Thanksgiving dinner at the Chinese restaurant. It was hardly the only time I had gone there with him. But tonight, three years later, when I was eating my egg rolls and hot and sour soup, I recalled that Thanksgiving and sitting across from him. I smiled, looked up at the empty side of the table, and said, "thanks for the stuff in the box." It sort of felt like he smiled back. I should have said, "Isle of Ewe"
Tuesday, July 18, 2017
Magpie Murders
The best word I can use to describe, Magpie Murders, is "clever." "Clever" popped into my head, thirty pages into it, and it remains there as an apt descriptor now that I have finished.
Yesterday, when done, I thought that while it is certainly clever I am not sure I can recommend spending 470 odd pages with it, just to be impressed with the author's impressive ability to have thought this up. Today, I am not so sure. I find myself thinking about how he put it all together and some parts that I did not get until this morning. There are a number of instances in the novel when a sleuth realizes that a key to solving the mystery lies in an anagram. So, this morning I took the name of the main character, Susan Ryeland, and tried (and am trying) to sleuth out what that anagram might be. (I will succumb after I finish writing this review and check Amazon to see if someone smarter than me got it, if indeed the name is a revealing puzzle of sorts).
In short, hats off to Anthony Horowitz-the author- for putting this together, but readers of this blog might get enough out of the following to decide not to read it. I will not give essential parts away.
A non revealing synopsis:
A fiction editor of a publishing company sits down to read a whodunit which is the most recent one of a series. This series about sleuth Atticus Pund has been the key breadwinner for the editor's publishing company. So, four pages into the book, the editor (and we readers) begin Magpie Murders which is both the title of the most recent fiction featuring Atticus Pund detective, and the title of Horowitz's book.
It's classic British whodunit. There's a funeral, all the potential suspects are introduced, someone seeks out Atticus Pund for his wisdom, Pund comes to town with his assistant, and works collaboratively with the local police. Meanwhile 217 pages later the editor (and we readers) stop reading the detective story. The editor has to solve a new (real life) mystery that is related to the novel's fiction. She then becomes the sleuth for the real mystery and in several ways mirrors Pund, the fictional character, as she interviews all potential players in the real life mystery related to the fictional mystery set decades earlier.
Eventually, the fictional and real life mysteries are solved, in the way that fictional whodunits are solved. There is a scene at the end of both where the sleuths reveal who done it and how they come to know who has done it. Life imitating art using art to demonstrate.
Sometimes I think I am very creative, but I don't think I could conceive of this intricate novel that contains another novel. Horowitz even paginates the book separately from the Pund novel. So you read four pages in the beginning and then start on page 1 of the Pund novel. Then 217 pages after that, you go back to page 5 of Horowitz's Magpie Murders that encompasses the fictional Magpie Murders, for 200 plus pages. Then the reader is taken back to page 218 of the fictional novel. You can pick up this fat book and look at the last page and see it is numbered 236 which makes no sense given its heft. But then you realize there is a 241 page novel inside.
What I liked second most (beyond just the idea) was the Pund novel. It was as good as the Agatha Christie type books I have read. Horowitz really imitates that style. And it is a good story in and of itself. (No, I did not figure out who done it).
If you like puzzles and like to read, you will probably enjoy Magpie Murders. However, I think the thing you will come away with more than anything else is an appreciation for the creativity of the author. And you will enjoy how sleuth Pund solves his case as well. If, however, you want a straight forward short novel, with perhaps a message that will hang around in your head, I'd put this one on the back burner.
Yesterday, when done, I thought that while it is certainly clever I am not sure I can recommend spending 470 odd pages with it, just to be impressed with the author's impressive ability to have thought this up. Today, I am not so sure. I find myself thinking about how he put it all together and some parts that I did not get until this morning. There are a number of instances in the novel when a sleuth realizes that a key to solving the mystery lies in an anagram. So, this morning I took the name of the main character, Susan Ryeland, and tried (and am trying) to sleuth out what that anagram might be. (I will succumb after I finish writing this review and check Amazon to see if someone smarter than me got it, if indeed the name is a revealing puzzle of sorts).
In short, hats off to Anthony Horowitz-the author- for putting this together, but readers of this blog might get enough out of the following to decide not to read it. I will not give essential parts away.
A non revealing synopsis:
A fiction editor of a publishing company sits down to read a whodunit which is the most recent one of a series. This series about sleuth Atticus Pund has been the key breadwinner for the editor's publishing company. So, four pages into the book, the editor (and we readers) begin Magpie Murders which is both the title of the most recent fiction featuring Atticus Pund detective, and the title of Horowitz's book.
It's classic British whodunit. There's a funeral, all the potential suspects are introduced, someone seeks out Atticus Pund for his wisdom, Pund comes to town with his assistant, and works collaboratively with the local police. Meanwhile 217 pages later the editor (and we readers) stop reading the detective story. The editor has to solve a new (real life) mystery that is related to the novel's fiction. She then becomes the sleuth for the real mystery and in several ways mirrors Pund, the fictional character, as she interviews all potential players in the real life mystery related to the fictional mystery set decades earlier.
Eventually, the fictional and real life mysteries are solved, in the way that fictional whodunits are solved. There is a scene at the end of both where the sleuths reveal who done it and how they come to know who has done it. Life imitating art using art to demonstrate.
Sometimes I think I am very creative, but I don't think I could conceive of this intricate novel that contains another novel. Horowitz even paginates the book separately from the Pund novel. So you read four pages in the beginning and then start on page 1 of the Pund novel. Then 217 pages after that, you go back to page 5 of Horowitz's Magpie Murders that encompasses the fictional Magpie Murders, for 200 plus pages. Then the reader is taken back to page 218 of the fictional novel. You can pick up this fat book and look at the last page and see it is numbered 236 which makes no sense given its heft. But then you realize there is a 241 page novel inside.
What I liked second most (beyond just the idea) was the Pund novel. It was as good as the Agatha Christie type books I have read. Horowitz really imitates that style. And it is a good story in and of itself. (No, I did not figure out who done it).
If you like puzzles and like to read, you will probably enjoy Magpie Murders. However, I think the thing you will come away with more than anything else is an appreciation for the creativity of the author. And you will enjoy how sleuth Pund solves his case as well. If, however, you want a straight forward short novel, with perhaps a message that will hang around in your head, I'd put this one on the back burner.
Ball Hype
Lonzo Ball may turn out to be better than I believe he will be in the NBA.
In the summer league, he had one very good game which I did not see, one very bad game which I did see, and one game where he showed some passing skills which were admirable.
The Lakers played eight games in the summer league and won the championship last night.
Of those eight games, Ball did not play in two of them because of injuries. In a third he sat out a good deal of the second half with the same injury that kept him out of the finals. The Lakers went 3-2 in the games he played in.
BEFORE the championship game last night--in which he did not play--the league voted him summer league MVP.
Come on.
The guy did not play in the championship game which the Lakers won. They won another 1 1/2 games without him. They lost two games with him.
How do you name a player MVP when he does not have an impact on over 25% of the short season?
It's hype. The father has a big mouth. A lot of people went to the games because of the hype surrounding Lonzo Ball. Maybe 15 years ago I went to a summer league game in Boston. It was held in a local gym. It was fun to watch, but maybe there were 500 people in attendance. Daddy Ball and NBA's marketing changed that this summer. So the kid is a draw.
But when you don't play in the championship game or in over 33 % of the games your team won, and your season opener was a Johnny on the spot latrine stinker...how do you win league MVP?
As I wrote in the beginning, there were some clips from his very good game which were impressive and they made me think that my overall assessment of the player could be wrong. And in another game, I saw some passing that was extra special. It is possible that he may be somewhere nearly as good as the experts think he will be. I am still not convinced, but maybe.
However, the decision to make him league MVP reflects the hype. You can't give the MVP to someone who does not play, unless you yourself have consumed the Dad's batch of Kool-Aid.
In the summer league, he had one very good game which I did not see, one very bad game which I did see, and one game where he showed some passing skills which were admirable.
The Lakers played eight games in the summer league and won the championship last night.
Of those eight games, Ball did not play in two of them because of injuries. In a third he sat out a good deal of the second half with the same injury that kept him out of the finals. The Lakers went 3-2 in the games he played in.
BEFORE the championship game last night--in which he did not play--the league voted him summer league MVP.
Come on.
The guy did not play in the championship game which the Lakers won. They won another 1 1/2 games without him. They lost two games with him.
How do you name a player MVP when he does not have an impact on over 25% of the short season?
It's hype. The father has a big mouth. A lot of people went to the games because of the hype surrounding Lonzo Ball. Maybe 15 years ago I went to a summer league game in Boston. It was held in a local gym. It was fun to watch, but maybe there were 500 people in attendance. Daddy Ball and NBA's marketing changed that this summer. So the kid is a draw.
But when you don't play in the championship game or in over 33 % of the games your team won, and your season opener was a Johnny on the spot latrine stinker...how do you win league MVP?
As I wrote in the beginning, there were some clips from his very good game which were impressive and they made me think that my overall assessment of the player could be wrong. And in another game, I saw some passing that was extra special. It is possible that he may be somewhere nearly as good as the experts think he will be. I am still not convinced, but maybe.
However, the decision to make him league MVP reflects the hype. You can't give the MVP to someone who does not play, unless you yourself have consumed the Dad's batch of Kool-Aid.
Monday, July 17, 2017
Thanks for the Memories
My brother came to visit last week. We had a number of moments where we recalled things about our folks which were, at once, funny and touching. At one point, he said something like, "Remember the house sale and dad with the furniture."
I didn't. He said, "you were there. you don't remember?" And I said I didn't.
I do remember the house sale. The home had been sold and we came in from Boston and New Jersey to help out as we attempted to sell various items that my parents did not want to haul to Florida. I have a pretty good recollection of various moments during the day. Our folks told us that anything we wanted we could have--and I still regret not taking this expandable table which did not go until closing time. I remember the goniff who tried to bid low on some pretty hoo hah picture frames. And the woman who showed up two hours before we were starting.
But this particular episode my brother was relaying, I did not recall. So when he told the funny story, I laughed so hard. The two of us were giggling like school kids.
Which was great. The problem was that the next day I remembered that he had, in fact, told me the story before. But when he told me the story the prior day, I had no recollection of it.
The last twenty five years of his life, my father's memory had failed him. He still was sharp in terms of reasoning and things like current events and politics. But I could tell him a story five times during a year and each time he said that I'd not told him the story previously. In the first ten years or so, I would say to him what my brother said to me the other day. "You were there, you don't remember?"
A college friend lives nearby and a few times a year we get together and have a drink. She told me some news on Friday which I professed not to have heard before. She said she was pretty sure she had mentioned it. I said I would remember.
On Saturday I went for a walk and stopped short when I had the realization that she had indeed told me this news at a prior quaffing session.
Point is I am not certain of what I had been certain about. I still can remember things that are stunning and my relatives are appropriately shocked when I pluck a fact from the fifties or sixties or remember how to get to a place I haven't been to in forty years. I know I will wow my classmates at our fiftieth high school reunion in the fall with trivia, and will be the go-to camper for esoteric questions about camp history when Chicopee cronies rendezvous in September.
The thing about memory though is when you lose it, you don't know it. So, unless it wafts up the next day--you could be under the illusion that what you don't remember did not occur. I am grateful for the memories I have and am also grateful that I have been fortunate enough to have a better memory than most--but these episodes have been yet another example that there is such a thing as deterioration and mortality.
Seize the day.
I didn't. He said, "you were there. you don't remember?" And I said I didn't.
I do remember the house sale. The home had been sold and we came in from Boston and New Jersey to help out as we attempted to sell various items that my parents did not want to haul to Florida. I have a pretty good recollection of various moments during the day. Our folks told us that anything we wanted we could have--and I still regret not taking this expandable table which did not go until closing time. I remember the goniff who tried to bid low on some pretty hoo hah picture frames. And the woman who showed up two hours before we were starting.
But this particular episode my brother was relaying, I did not recall. So when he told the funny story, I laughed so hard. The two of us were giggling like school kids.
Which was great. The problem was that the next day I remembered that he had, in fact, told me the story before. But when he told me the story the prior day, I had no recollection of it.
The last twenty five years of his life, my father's memory had failed him. He still was sharp in terms of reasoning and things like current events and politics. But I could tell him a story five times during a year and each time he said that I'd not told him the story previously. In the first ten years or so, I would say to him what my brother said to me the other day. "You were there, you don't remember?"
A college friend lives nearby and a few times a year we get together and have a drink. She told me some news on Friday which I professed not to have heard before. She said she was pretty sure she had mentioned it. I said I would remember.
On Saturday I went for a walk and stopped short when I had the realization that she had indeed told me this news at a prior quaffing session.
Point is I am not certain of what I had been certain about. I still can remember things that are stunning and my relatives are appropriately shocked when I pluck a fact from the fifties or sixties or remember how to get to a place I haven't been to in forty years. I know I will wow my classmates at our fiftieth high school reunion in the fall with trivia, and will be the go-to camper for esoteric questions about camp history when Chicopee cronies rendezvous in September.
The thing about memory though is when you lose it, you don't know it. So, unless it wafts up the next day--you could be under the illusion that what you don't remember did not occur. I am grateful for the memories I have and am also grateful that I have been fortunate enough to have a better memory than most--but these episodes have been yet another example that there is such a thing as deterioration and mortality.
Seize the day.
Palindrome Redux
I had to go to the bank today. I went to fill out my slip and realized that today, is another palindrome.
7-1-7-1-7. Backwards and forwards
And then a moment ago, a week late, I realized that every single day since July 10, and up until July 19th will be a palindrome.
7-1-0-1-7 and 7-1-2-1-7 and etcetera.
So much for novelty. After the 19th we will have to wait until August of 18 when again we will be lousy with palindromes.
That was an expression my father and mother used to use. If you were lousy with something, that meant you had a lot of it. It actually stemmed from "lice"--that is if you had lice you were lousy with them. I imagine the derivative of the adjective lousy as it is commonly used is based on the wonderful experience of having lice.
----
On Saturday morning I noticed that the basement sink was overflowing. There is a trick I use to clean out clogs in the elbow drain but that was not working. Eventually I carted out some water because it was close to toppling over. I measured the distance from the top of the sink to the water. It was 6 inches. I took a shower. Measured again. it was three inches. I knew I had tsuris.
I tried some home remedies to no avail. All day Sunday the water would have cascaded out of the sink had I not bailed out gallons of water and stopped using water in the house. I had to go to the gym to take a shower and shave. I called local plumbers. Most plumbers, I was surprised to find out, do not do clogs. There are some specialty outfits which cost, hold onto your plunger, 300 bananas to unclog your pipe. One fellow was very friendly and he agreed to come out this morning.
I took him downstairs. We went to the sink. The water was gone. For two days the water was hanging around like the neighbor who comes to chat and doesn't take a hint when you are all but begging him to leave. The clog cleaner comes by and and for 300 dollars there is nothing in the sink. He ran his gizmo through the pipe anyway and cleared the pipes of roots. I was lousy with roots.
We noticed that there was a leak under the sink. His comment. "You'll need to call a plumber."
The guy was very nice but explained to me that you need a plumber's license to do plumbing, but just a powerful machine to clean major league clogs. So now, 300 bananas after my pipe was cleaned, I need to call a plumber.
Good news is I can take a shower.
Bad news is that I can't afford the soap.
7-1-7-1-7. Backwards and forwards
And then a moment ago, a week late, I realized that every single day since July 10, and up until July 19th will be a palindrome.
7-1-0-1-7 and 7-1-2-1-7 and etcetera.
So much for novelty. After the 19th we will have to wait until August of 18 when again we will be lousy with palindromes.
That was an expression my father and mother used to use. If you were lousy with something, that meant you had a lot of it. It actually stemmed from "lice"--that is if you had lice you were lousy with them. I imagine the derivative of the adjective lousy as it is commonly used is based on the wonderful experience of having lice.
----
On Saturday morning I noticed that the basement sink was overflowing. There is a trick I use to clean out clogs in the elbow drain but that was not working. Eventually I carted out some water because it was close to toppling over. I measured the distance from the top of the sink to the water. It was 6 inches. I took a shower. Measured again. it was three inches. I knew I had tsuris.
I tried some home remedies to no avail. All day Sunday the water would have cascaded out of the sink had I not bailed out gallons of water and stopped using water in the house. I had to go to the gym to take a shower and shave. I called local plumbers. Most plumbers, I was surprised to find out, do not do clogs. There are some specialty outfits which cost, hold onto your plunger, 300 bananas to unclog your pipe. One fellow was very friendly and he agreed to come out this morning.
I took him downstairs. We went to the sink. The water was gone. For two days the water was hanging around like the neighbor who comes to chat and doesn't take a hint when you are all but begging him to leave. The clog cleaner comes by and and for 300 dollars there is nothing in the sink. He ran his gizmo through the pipe anyway and cleared the pipes of roots. I was lousy with roots.
We noticed that there was a leak under the sink. His comment. "You'll need to call a plumber."
The guy was very nice but explained to me that you need a plumber's license to do plumbing, but just a powerful machine to clean major league clogs. So now, 300 bananas after my pipe was cleaned, I need to call a plumber.
Good news is I can take a shower.
Bad news is that I can't afford the soap.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
